You’ve Never Seen a Toyota Celica Like This – Insanely Rare Find

Toyota Celica

Picture this: you’re wandering through the bustling corridors of the 1991 Detroit Auto Show, surrounded by the usual suspects – gleaming production cars, flashy concept vehicles, and enough chrome to blind a small village. Then, tucked away in a corner, you spot something that makes you do a double-take. It’s unmistakably a Toyota Celica, yet something’s dramatically different. The windshield looks like it’s been attacked by an overzealous barber, the proportions seem all wrong, and there’s an aura of rebellious coolness that you’d never associate with conservative Toyota.

Toyota Celica Tsunami Speedster 2

Welcome to the world of the Toyota Celica Speedster, also known by its internal codename “Tsunami” – a one-off creation that pushed the boundaries of what a Japanese sports car could be. This isn’t just another forgotten concept car gathering dust in some corporate warehouse. This is the story of automotive rebellion, corporate risk-taking, and a machine that dared to challenge conventions in an era when Toyota was anything but rebellious.

The Birth of an Automotive Maverick

### The Foundation: More Than Just Another Celica

The story begins with the 42nd All-Trac Turbo to roll off Toyota’s production line. Originally dressed in what Toyota called “Super Red,” this particular Celica wasn’t destined for a normal life of grocery runs and weekend canyon carving. Instead, it served as a test mule for Toyota’s engineering team in California, enduring countless hours of evaluation and development work.

But here’s where things get interesting. Once the engineers had extracted every last bit of data from this hardworking test vehicle, Toyota made an unusual decision. Instead of scrapping it or selling it off, they handed it over to the American Sunroof Corporation (ASC) with a simple brief: create something spectacular for the Detroit Auto Show.

Toyota Celica Tsunami Speedster 9

### The Timing Was Everything

The early 1990s represented a fascinating period in automotive history. The Japanese bubble economy was in full swing, manufacturers were throwing money at wild concepts, and the American market was hungry for something different. Porsche had just reintroduced the 911 Speedster in 1989, tapping into nostalgia for the original 356 Speedster while adding a dose of exclusivity to their lineup.

Toyota, watching Porsche’s success, realized they had an opportunity. The fifth-generation Celica was already turning heads with its “futuristic features” theme, blending what Toyota called a “super round” greenhouse with dynamically curved body lines. The car was packed with cutting-edge technology, including speed-responsive electronically controlled four-wheel steering and Toyota’s revolutionary Actively Controlled Suspension system – a world-first technology that independently managed four hydropneumatic suspension units.

Transformation: From Test Mule to Show Star

### ASC Works Their Magic

The American Sunroof Corporation wasn’t just any conversion company. These were the specialists who had been transforming regular cars into convertibles for major manufacturers, and they brought all their expertise to bear on this project. But the Celica Speedster wouldn’t be a simple roof-chop job.

The most dramatic modification was the windshield – or what remained of it. ASC chopped and raked the glass so severely that for average-height drivers, it barely reached eye level. This wasn’t just a styling exercise; it was a complete reimagining of what a car’s proportions could be. The side windows were cut down to match this radical new roofline, creating a cohesive but utterly impractical silhouette.

### Interior Revolution

Inside, ASC went wild with the transformation. The seats received a complete retrimming, while pseudo-carbon fiber trim was strategically placed throughout the cabin. But perhaps the most eye-catching change was the liberal use of yellow spray paint on various interior components, creating a bold contrast that screamed “concept car” from every angle.

One particularly clever feature was a removable plastic panel that covered the rear seats. With this panel in place, the Celica transformed from a four-seater into a strict two-seater sports car, emphasizing the driver-focused nature of the machine. Remove the panel, and you had a more practical four-seat configuration – though calling any seating position in this car “practical” might be stretching the definition.

Technical Specifications and Performance

Component Specification Notes
Base Model All-Trac Turbo #42 42nd production unit
Engine 2.0L Turbo 4-cylinder All-wheel drive system
Windshield Chopped and raked Eye-level height for average drivers
Wheels 17-inch custom Vredestein Hypertrac 215/45/R17
Paint Custom Yellow over Super Red Original red still visible in engine bay
Interior Yellow accents, carbon trim Removable rear seat cover
Suspension Actively Controlled World-first hydropneumatic system
Steering 4WS Electronic Speed-responsive system
Production One unit only Museum piece status

Show Circuit and Public Reception

### Detroit Auto Show Debut

When the Celica Speedster made its debut at the 1991 Detroit Auto Show, it represented something entirely new from Toyota. Here was a company known for reliability and sensible engineering choices, suddenly presenting a vehicle that prioritized style over practicality. The chopped windshield meant you’d need sunglasses even on overcast days, and the reduced glass area would make highway driving an exercise in faith.

Yet that was precisely the point. This wasn’t meant to be a practical car – it was meant to be a statement. Toyota was showing the world that they could create something as wild and desirable as anything coming from European sports car manufacturers.

### The LA Auto Show Follow-Up

The car made a second major appearance at the 1993 LA Auto Show, two years after its Detroit debut. By this time, Toyota had actually released a production convertible version of the Celica, but the difference between the practical production car and the radical Speedster concept couldn’t have been more stark.

Where the production convertible featured a conventional soft-top and normal windshield height, the Speedster remained uncompromisingly extreme. It served as a reminder of what could have been, had Toyota chosen to pursue the most dramatic possible interpretation of a Celica convertible.

The Disappearing Act and Rediscovery

### Years in the Wilderness

After its show circuit appearances, the Celica Speedster essentially vanished from public view. Unlike many concept cars that get dismantled or recycled, this unique machine somehow survived intact. For years, automotive enthusiasts wondered about its fate, with occasional rumors surfacing about sightings at private collections or corporate archives.

The car’s disappearance was particularly frustrating because it represented such a unique moment in Toyota’s history. Here was tangible proof that the company could create something truly special when they allowed their designers and engineers to push boundaries without the usual corporate constraints.

### Peterson Museum Sanctuary

Eventually, the automotive gods smiled upon enthusiasts everywhere. The Celica Speedster found its way to the Peterson Automotive Museum in Los Angeles, one of the world’s premier automotive institutions. The Peterson, with its eclectic collection ranging from Hollywood cars to rare prototypes, provided the perfect home for this one-off creation.

At the Peterson, the Speedster isn’t just a static display piece. The museum regularly features it in special exhibitions and even takes it to events like Radwood, the celebration of 1980s and 1990s automotive culture. For many enthusiasts, these appearances represent the only chance they’ll ever have to see this unique machine in person.

Modern Legacy and Market Reality

### The Production Alternative

While the Speedster remained a one-off fantasy, Toyota did produce conventional convertible versions of the fifth-generation Celica. These cars were manufactured in Japan and shipped to the United States, where ASC – the same company that created the Speedster – installed and finished the power soft tops on an order-by-order basis.

### Today’s Market Values

Here’s where the story takes an interesting turn. While the one-off Speedster is priceless as a museum piece, regular Celica convertibles from the same era have become incredibly affordable. A 1992 convertible that originally sold for $22,313 now averages just $2,264 according to current market data. Similarly, a 1993 model that cost $23,903 when new can now be purchased for around $2,496 on average.

This dramatic depreciation means that while you’ll never own the Speedster itself, you can experience a similar flavor of 1990s Japanese convertible motoring for the price of a decent used appliance.

### Why This Car Matters

The Toyota Celica Speedster represents something that’s become increasingly rare in today’s automotive landscape: genuine corporate risk-taking. In an era when most concept cars are carefully focus-grouped and designed to offend absolutely no one, the Speedster stood as a bold statement of intent.

It showed that Toyota, despite its reputation for conservative engineering, was capable of creating something genuinely exciting when given the freedom to experiment. The chopped windshield wasn’t practical, the yellow interior wasn’t subtle, and the overall execution wasn’t sensible – and that was exactly the point.

### Lessons for Today

Looking at the Speedster today, it’s impossible not to wonder what might have been. What if Toyota had been brave enough to put this design into limited production? What if they had continued to push boundaries with subsequent concept cars? What if the bean counters hadn’t won the eternal corporate battle against the dreamers?

The car serves as a reminder that sometimes the most memorable automotive creations are the ones that make the least practical sense. In a world increasingly dominated by SUVs and electric crossovers, there’s something refreshing about a car that existed purely to make people stop and stare.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many Toyota Celica Speedsters were ever built?

Only one was ever constructed, making it one of the rarest Toyota vehicles in existence.

Q: Can I buy a regular Celica convertible from the same era?

Yes, production convertibles are very affordable today, typically selling for $2,000-$3,000.

Q: Where can I see the Speedster in person?

It’s permanently housed at the Peterson Automotive Museum in Los Angeles and occasionally appears at automotive events.

Also Read: –Toyota Land Cruiser FJ Mini SUV Jimny rival exposed in patent images

2025 Ford Ranger vs Chevrolet Colorado Battle: Which Midsize Truck Wins?

Ford Ranger

The midsize pickup truck segment has become increasingly competitive, with manufacturers pushing boundaries to deliver vehicles that blend capability, comfort, and technology. Two standouts in this crowded field are the 2025 Ford Ranger and the 2025 Chevrolet Colorado. Both trucks have undergone significant updates in recent years, positioning themselves as formidable contenders for buyers seeking a vehicle that can handle both daily commuting and weekend adventures.

After spending considerable time evaluating both vehicles, it’s clear that each truck brings unique strengths to the table. The decision between these two ultimately comes down to your specific priorities—whether you value raw power, advanced technology, pricing flexibility, or off-road capability. This comprehensive analysis will help you understand which truck aligns better with your needs.

Engine Performance and Power Delivery

### Ford Ranger’s Multi-Engine Approach

The 2025 Ford Ranger offers buyers flexibility with three distinct engine options. The base model features a turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder producing 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides adequate power for most daily driving scenarios, though some reviewers note a slight turbo lag during initial acceleration.

2019 Chevrolet Colorado vs Ford Ranger Comparison Test | AutoTrader.ca

For those seeking more muscle, Ford offers a twin-turbocharged 2.7-liter V6 generating 315 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque. This optional powerplant delivers noticeably stronger acceleration and feels more confident when towing heavy loads. The range-topping Ranger Raptor takes performance to another level with its 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6, pumping out an impressive 405 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque.

### Colorado’s Simplified but Potent Strategy

Chevrolet has taken a different approach for 2025, standardizing all Colorado models with a single turbocharged 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine. This “TurboMax” powerplant produces 310 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque—more than Ford’s base engine and even competitive with the Ranger’s optional V6. The torque advantage is particularly noticeable during real-world driving, providing strong pull from low RPMs.

The Colorado’s eight-speed automatic transmission pairs seamlessly with the turbocharged engine, delivering smooth shifts and responsive downshifts when passing power is needed. During our evaluation, the Colorado consistently felt more eager to accelerate from a standstill compared to the base Ranger.

Interior Design and Technology Integration

### Ranger’s F-150 DNA

Step inside the 2025 Ford Ranger, and you’ll immediately notice its familial resemblance to the full-size F-150. The interior design emphasizes functionality with clean lines and logical control placement. Base models feature an 8.0-inch digital gauge cluster and 10.0-inch infotainment touchscreen, while higher trims upgrade to a 12.4-inch digital instrument panel and 12.0-inch central display.

The Ranger’s cabin materials vary significantly by trim level. Entry-level models feature more hard plastics, while Lariat and Raptor variants include leather appointments and soft-touch surfaces. The optional Bang & Olufsen sound system delivers impressive audio quality, and the availability of wireless charging adds convenience for smartphone users.

### Colorado’s Modern Approach

The Colorado’s interior strikes a balance between ruggedness and refinement. All models feature an 11.3-inch touchscreen with Google built-in, providing seamless smartphone integration and over-the-air updates. The interface responds quickly to inputs and includes useful features like segment-first underbody cameras that show real-time views beneath the truck.

Seat comfort in the Colorado is notably good, with supportive bolstering and available heating functions. The ZR2 trim upgrades to genuine leather seating with distinctive red stitching. Storage solutions throughout the cabin are well-thought-out, with practical cup holders and compartments for everyday items.

2024 Ford Ranger Raptor vs. Chevrolet Colorado ZR2: Off-Road Comparison  Test!

Pricing Analysis and Value Proposition

### Ford Ranger’s Tiered Pricing Structure

The 2025 Ford Ranger starts at $34,675 for the base XL trim with rear-wheel drive. Adding four-wheel drive increases the price by approximately $3,645 for base models. The XLT trim begins around $37,705, while the well-equipped Lariat starts at $45,475. The performance-oriented Raptor commands a premium at $57,315.

This pricing structure allows buyers to choose their desired level of equipment and capability, though costs can escalate quickly when adding options. The availability of multiple engine choices means you might need to step up to higher trims to access the more powerful V6 options.

### Colorado’s Competitive Starting Point

Chevrolet positions the 2025 Colorado aggressively with a starting price of $31,900 for the Work Truck (WT) trim. The popular LT trim begins at $35,800, while the Trail Boss—offering enhanced off-road capability—starts at $39,800. The top-tier ZR2 commands $49,600, positioning it well below the Ranger Raptor.

The Colorado’s standardization of the more powerful engine across all trims represents exceptional value. Where Ford charges extra for V6 power, Chevrolet includes their 310-horsepower engine as standard equipment, making the Colorado an attractive option for power-conscious buyers on a budget.

Towing and Hauling Capabilities

Both trucks excel in their ability to handle work and recreational towing duties, though with some important distinctions. The Chevrolet Colorado edges out the Ford Ranger with a maximum towing capacity of 7,700 pounds versus the Ranger’s 7,500-pound limit. However, this 200-pound advantage only applies when properly equipped.

The Ranger achieves its maximum towing rating with the standard 2.3-liter engine, while the Colorado requires its more powerful 2.7-liter turbo to reach peak capacity. This means Ranger buyers get maximum towing capability without paying extra for engine upgrades.

Payload capacity favors the Ford Ranger, which can carry up to 1,805 pounds in its bed compared to the Colorado’s 1,700-pound maximum. The Ranger’s bed dimensions also provide advantages, measuring approximately three inches wider at the wheel wells, allowing standard 4×8 plywood sheets to fit between them.

Off-Road Performance and Capability

### Ranger’s Raptor Dominance

For serious off-road enthusiasts, the Ford Ranger Raptor stands in a class of its own. With Fox Racing shocks featuring Live Valve technology, increased ground clearance, and specialized suspension geometry, the Raptor tackles challenging terrain with confidence. Seven drive modes, including a dedicated Baja setting for high-speed desert running, optimize performance for various conditions.

The Raptor’s 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 provides abundant power for climbing steep inclines and powering through sand dunes. Locking front and rear differentials ensure maximum traction when needed, while the wider track width enhances stability during aggressive off-road driving.

### Colorado’s Trail-Ready Options

Chevrolet offers multiple off-road variants, starting with the Trail Boss and culminating in the hardcore ZR2. The Trail Boss provides excellent value with 32-inch all-terrain tires, increased suspension travel, and a limited-slip rear differential. For those seeking maximum capability, the ZR2 features Multimatic DSSV dampers, locking front and rear differentials, and an impressive 10.7 inches of ground clearance.

The Colorado ZR2 Bison, developed in collaboration with American Expedition Vehicles, takes durability to the next level with additional underbody protection and enhanced recovery points. While not as powerful as the Ranger Raptor, the ZR2 lineup offers multiple options to match different budgets and capability requirements.

Specification 2025 Ford Ranger 2025 Chevrolet Colorado
Starting Price $34,675 $31,900
Base Engine 2.3L Turbo I4 (270 hp/310 lb-ft) 2.7L Turbo I4 (310 hp/430 lb-ft)
Max Towing 7,500 lbs 7,700 lbs
Max Payload 1,805 lbs 1,700 lbs
Fuel Economy (RWD) 21/26 MPG (city/highway) 20/27 MPG (city/highway)
Ground Clearance 8.9 inches (standard) 8.9 inches (standard)
Bed Length 5.0 feet 5.2 feet
Infotainment Screen 10.0-12.0 inches 11.3 inches

Safety and Driver Assistance Features

Both trucks prioritize occupant protection with comprehensive safety suites. The Ford Ranger includes Co-Pilot360 as standard equipment, featuring automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keeping assist. Higher trims add adaptive cruise control and a 360-degree camera system for enhanced visibility.

The Chevrolet Colorado counters with Chevy Safety Assist, which includes six advanced safety features as standard. Notable additions for 2025 include Blind Zone Steering Assist and Rear Cross Traffic Braking on WT and higher trims. The available Technology Package adds adaptive cruise control and surround-view cameras.

Both trucks have earned strong safety ratings, though specific IIHS and NHTSA scores vary by model year and configuration. The addition of advanced driver assistance features helps both vehicles compete effectively against luxury midsize trucks.

Fuel Economy and Real-World Efficiency

Fuel efficiency represents an important consideration for midsize truck buyers, particularly those using their vehicles for daily commuting. The Ford Ranger’s base 2.3-liter engine achieves EPA ratings of 21 mpg city and 26 mpg highway with rear-wheel drive. Four-wheel drive models typically see a 1-2 mpg reduction across both categories.

The Chevrolet Colorado’s more powerful standard engine returns 20 mpg city and 27 mpg highway with rear-wheel drive configuration. While city efficiency trails the Ranger slightly, highway performance matches or exceeds Ford’s offering. The eight-speed automatic transmission’s gear ratios help optimize fuel consumption during highway cruising.

Real-world testing reveals that both trucks can achieve their EPA estimates with conservative driving. However, aggressive acceleration and frequent towing will significantly impact fuel economy for both vehicles.

Technology and Connectivity Features

Modern truck buyers expect seamless smartphone integration and advanced connectivity features. The Ford Ranger delivers with SYNC 4A infotainment system, supporting both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Over-the-air updates ensure the system stays current with new features and security patches.

The Chevrolet Colorado’s Google built-in system provides deep integration with Google services, including Maps, Assistant, and Play Store access. This approach offers more comprehensive functionality than traditional smartphone mirroring, though some users prefer the familiarity of CarPlay or Android Auto.

Both systems include USB charging ports and available wireless charging pads. Higher trim levels add premium audio systems—Bang & Olufsen for Ford and Bose for Chevrolet—delivering impressive sound quality for music enthusiasts.

Final Verdict: Choosing Your Champion

Selecting between the 2025 Ford Ranger and Chevrolet Colorado requires careful consideration of your specific needs and priorities. The Ford Ranger excels in offering choice—multiple engines, extensive trim levels, and the unmatched capability of the Raptor variant. Buyers who prioritize maximum off-road performance or need multiple powertrain options will find the Ranger compelling.

The Chevrolet Colorado makes a strong case through its value proposition and standardized power. Every Colorado delivers more horsepower and torque than the base Ranger while starting at a lower price point. The simplified lineup reduces decision fatigue while ensuring all buyers receive substantial performance capability.

For budget-conscious buyers seeking maximum power per dollar, the Colorado represents exceptional value. Those willing to pay more for specialized capability or preferring Ford’s brand reputation might gravitate toward the Ranger. Both trucks deliver competent performance, modern features, and the versatility that makes midsize pickups increasingly popular.

The midsize truck segment continues evolving rapidly, with both manufacturers planning hybrid powertrains and enhanced technology features for future model years. Current buyers can feel confident that either choice will serve them well, whether tackling weekend projects, daily commuting, or weekend adventure activities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which truck offers better value for money?

The Chevrolet Colorado provides superior value with its more powerful standard engine and lower starting price.

What’s the towing capacity difference between these trucks?

The Colorado can tow 200 pounds more (7,700 lbs vs 7,500 lbs) when properly equipped.

Which truck is better for off-road driving?

The Ford Ranger Raptor offers the most capable off-road performance, while the Colorado ZR2 provides excellent capability at a lower price point.

Also Read:-2026 jeep cherokee Future Cars: Is Such A Big Deal